Email Contact Phone Company Visit Website

London, United Kingdom Office

4th Floor 33 Sun Street
London
GB

Boston, USA Office Head Office

14 Oak Park Drive
Boston
MA
US

New York Office

52 Vanderbilt Avenue
New York
US

Telephone

0870 351 7212

Contact

Leanne Brown
[email protected]
Back to all Progress Software announcements

Progress Software Survey Reveals the Realities of Regulation, Monitoring and Algorithms on the OTC Derivatives Market

Progress Software Corporation (NASDAQ: PRGS), a leading software provider that enables enterprises to be operationally responsive, today announced results from global research which indicate that brokers in the OTC derivatives market see the competitive advantages to compliance with regulations such as those proposed in the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act in the US and the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive ("MiFID") in Europe, but do not want to be responsible for inspecting their own algorithmic trading strategies before they are deployed in the market.

The study, carried out by independent market research firm, Vanson Bourne, between April and May 2011, found that 76 percent of financial institutions agree that algorithms must be carefully monitored and tested before they are put into the market. However, 65 percent do not believe they should be responsible for reviewing algorithms before deployment. In fact, 49 percent of respondents believe regulators should be responsible for inspecting algorithms before they go to market.

Other key findings include:

- 67 percent believe that rogue algorithms are inescapable. That number rises to as much as 78 percent in the US. Those who use third-party solutions to monitor their trade reconciliation process feel strongly about this, with 72 percent responding that rogue algorithms are unpreventable.

- 51 percent believe compliance with reforms will provide a competitive advantage and 19 percent view it as a way to avoid litigation.

- 60 percent of respondents in the UK believe that reforms are happening too quickly, compared to 46 percent in the US.

- Those with third party transaction monitoring solutions worry less about the speed of reforms and are not as likely to feel the need for regulators to check all algorithms. They are also less likely to predict a decrease in trade volume as a result of shifting regulations.

Dr. John Bates, chief technology officer of Progress Software and member of the Technology Advisory Committee for the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) said: “With Dodd-Frank on the brink of implementation, we’re entering uncharted territory and only time will tell how shifts in regulation will impact trading volumes or what asset classes will be most affected by the next ‘Flash Crash’ or ‘Splash Crash’. The reality is that regulators are not ready to police algorithms, which means institutions must have processes in place that enable them to detect significant market movements, potential abuse and out of control algorithms in real-time in order to gain competitive advantage.”