Over 500 senior securitization market participants from 200 organizations took part in the study between June and September 2010. 90% of the investors that responded stated that over the next two years their organizations had plans to implement technology to improve analytical, risk and operational processes to overcome challenges in managing ABS, MBS and structured credit investment portfolios.
Investors selected and ranked the investment analysis, risk surveillance and operational requirements they saw as most critical to compliance with regulatory due diligence requirements in the next 12 months. They also provided insight into how well they currently performed against these key criteria.
The most important objective identified by investors was timely access and effective integration of collateral pool performance data for investment and risk analysis. This was followed by the effective modeling of deal waterfall structures and cashflows for all the assets managed within a given portfolio. Although recognized as critical activities, 54% of all the investors surveyed stated that they were ineffective at accessing and monitoring performance data for the securities they held, or those they planned to invest in. This includes an inability to monitor pool performance measures that must be tracked for capital relief under the Basel II Securitization Framework Enhancements, such as delinquency, default, recovery and prepayment rates. Similarly, over 50% of investors stated that they were not effective at modeling deal structures and cashflow behavior within their systems, hindering forecasting, ongoing valuations and stress testing.
âWe have not performed well in these areas given a lack of information and systems to accomplish the necessary level of analysis and oversight. Systems limitations are still a primary shortcoming,â stated a Managing Director, Credit Investment at a global bank based in the US. âA lack of focus to implement a global system for structured finance continues and manual entries are still needed to pull together the broad coverage and data required for all our exposures.â
Other key findings from the survey include:
â¢ 75% of investors ranked the consolidated risk surveillance of portfolio, deal, tranche and collateral pool performance in their top two risk management concerns. 55% stated they were not effective at addressing this concern.
â¢ 72% of investors said they were ineffective at establishing and monitoring hard and soft triggers related to structured finance assets
â¢ Only 35% of investors felt they effectively managed their global structured finance exposures in a single integrated environment.
âInvestors are cognizant of new due diligence requirements and their need to address the shortfalls in analytical, risk management and operational practices before new rules are enforced in 2011. Even with greater issuer disclosure, understanding new deals will be an intensive task without the right tools and operations in place. Worse, it can lead to misinformed investment decisions, capital penalties or being priced out of the market altogether,â stated Douglas Long, EVP Business Strategy at Principia. âThese results further validate Principiaâs product development over the last two years and will help us continue to deliver the most comprehensive front to back office functionality demanded by structured finance investors.â
The results are analyzed further Principiaâs new whitepaper, Structured finance perspectives: Investor due diligence comes into focus, available for download at www.ppllc.com/investorduediligence.htm