The drafted legislation released last Friday recognizes and differentiates business end users from large financial institutions. Specifically, this draft focuses central clearing requirements on large market participants rather than on business end users. It also precludes those who use OTC derivatives to prudently manage risk from being subject to higher regulatory thresholds under the definition of major swap participant.
Mr. Hall told the committee, âIt is an honor and great responsibility to participate in this hearing,â and âgiven the events in the financial markets in recent years, we applaud the Administration and Congress for considering appropriate changes to our financial regulatory framework, including the area of derivatives.â
In todayâs testimony Chatham presented five recommendations for improvement to this draft legislation:
1.The first change is to exclude business end users from any margin requirement. âWe think that any requirement for business end users to cash collateralize hedging transactions would create an extraordinary and unnecessarily drain on working capital,â testified Mr. Hall.
2.Second, Chatham stated that this draft should be clarified regarding capital charges so that regulators are instructed to set capital charges based on historic or predicted loss, and not as a penalty to discourage the use of OTC derivatives.
3.Third, this draft bill recognizes that systemically significant institutions should be subject to higher standards than those that cannot impose systemic risk. However, as currently written, it is possible that non-systemically significant firms could be subject to the same regulatory burden that applies to large financial institutions.
4.Fourth, Chatham states that the term âmajor swap participantâ which is broadly defined as those having a substantial net position, be defined by legislation versus by regulators which is how the legislation reads today.
5.Finally, Chatham has recommended that this legislation grant regulators the authority to provide exemptive relief where they deem necessary in an effort to address any of the unforeseen consequences that could result from this historic legislation.
In addition to Chathamâs testimony, the House Financial Services Committee also heard testimony, as part of this proceeding, from CFTC Chairman Gensler, SEC Director Hu and representatives from Cargill Inc., Ohio State University, Prudential Financial, SIFMA, Managed Funds Association, Deere & Company, Wholesale Markets Brokers Association and the Americans for Financial Reform.
Wednesdayâs testimony by Chatham is a continuation of their involvement with end users to meet the Administrations objectives for regulation, without causing unintended consequences for businesses actively using derivatives to manage business risks. Over the last several months Chatham has evaluated and commented on the proposals brought forth, and have educated end users on the implications of each proposal. As part of this education effort Chatham established a website to inform and educate the public about the issues. According to Dave Hall, âOur goal is not to avoid regulation but to help get it right. We will continue to make ourselves available to our clients and our elected officials to assist in meeting this goal.â