Email Contact Phone Company Visit Website

Cary, NC USA Head Office

SAS Institute Inc., 100 SAS Campus Drive
Cary, NC

SAS UK Ltd Office

Wittington House Henley Road Medmenham




Barbara Anthony
[email protected]
Back to all SAS announcements

Business performance matches regulatory compliance in driving enterprise risk management

Chartis Research and SAS study shows data integration is still top challenge in risk management programmes

Financial services firms rank performance management and regulatory compliance as equal drivers of enterprise risk management (ERM) systems according to a global survey of 410 financial services executives. Also, most financial institutions anticipate significant business rewards: improved performance management, and reduced capital allocation and credit loss. The results of the study conducted by Chartis Research and SAS, the leader in business intelligence, were unveiled today at SAS Forum 2007 in Stockholm.

Although many firms expect ERM to generate significant benefits, only 26 percent of financial institutions participating in the survey said they had a well formulated and well-communicated ERM strategy, with a clear timetable for implementation. Even more telling was that 25 percent of respondents had no current strategy or plans regarding ERM.

According to the executives surveyed, data quality and data management continue to be the biggest obstacles to the successful implementation of an ERM system. Traditional silo-based approaches to managing risks are not providing the value that can be realised with integrated and consolidated risk management systems and processes, which result in reduced costs and improved performance. Survey respondents supported linking different risk systems into a single technology environment, providing an enterprise wide, holistic and integrated view of all risks.

The survey also found that credit risk management is still the top risk management expenditure priority for most firms, with exposure to credit losses gaining in importance. In addition, 60 percent of respondents said ERM programmes would enable them to reduce their economic capital allocation over the next 24 months, with an average estimated reduction of 8 percent. The key contributor to this reduction was improved credit risk management.

Furthermore, market risk and financial crime have emerged as key priorities. The resurrected focus on market risk is driven by a desire to replace legacy systems that lack scalability and speed. In addition, counter-fraud initiatives have seen an increased investment including areas such as lending, credit/debit card, internal, and insurance fraud. Also, the insurance industry has shown a renewed interest in ERM that is related to the general convergence of insurance and banking sectors and the cross-fertilisation of risk management methodologies.

“The survey confirms that firms are aiming to have a more integrated and systematic approach to ERM,” said David Rogers, SAS’ Global Product Marketing Manager for Risk. “Institutions are realising that a flexible technology architecture based upon a single risk intelligence platform with superior data integration techniques is critical for a successful, long-term ERM programme.”