"Of the insurers we rate based in Europe we've found that ERM programs at 86% are adequate, compared with 81% for all insurers globally," said Standard & Poor's credit analyst Laura Santori. "The outlook for ERM is nevertheless clearly positive."
The results of Standard & Poor's survey of insurance groups also showed that ERM programs at 8% of them are "strong" (versus 11% globally), 4% are "excellent" (versus 5% globally), and 2% are "weak" (versus 3% globally).
Standard & Poor's classifies ERM programs at insurance companies into four categories: excellent, strong, adequate, and weak. The assessment takes into account an analysis of several components: risk management culture, risk controls, emerging-risk management, risk and economic capital modeling, and strategic risk management. Today's report also shows how European insurance companies are doing for each of these five components.
Standard & Poor's has been evaluating ERMs as a regular part of its credit ratings analysis since 2005.
"We're seeing greater interest by insurers in establishing ERM systems not only to meet regulatory requirements but also to their competitive advantage," said Standard & Poor's credit analyst Keith Bevan. "A number of companies are starting to invest substantially in various aspects of ERM."
This comes with an increased pace of change in risk management practices in the run-up to the EU's Solvency II project, which aims to bring regulatory capital requirements at insurance companies more in line with their true risks.
This month is to bring the EU's establishment of the legal framework for implementing Solvency II, although the final implementation date is to be deferred until 2012.
"Our ERM analysis is already well under way, and will complement Pillar 2 of Solvency II when it is rolled out," Mr. Bevan said.